Methodology & Accuracy
This page documents how the IQ Check test is built and scored — including the assumptions, so you can judge the result rather than take our word for it. If a claim on this site ever seems to conflict with this page, this page wins.
The test
The test consists of 35 matrix-reasoning items: 3×3 visual grids governed by one or more rules (progression, rotation, counting, Latin-square membership, positional movement, element arithmetic, XOR composition, and combinations), ordered from easy to hard. Six response options accompany each item; distractors are systematic rule violations — the classic error patterns — rather than random fillers. The format follows the Raven-style figure-matrix tradition used across professional fluid-reasoning scales; the items themselves are original to this site.
We use matrix items because fluid reasoning is the single best-loaded component of general intelligence and requires no language, mathematics or cultural knowledge — which makes a web test meaningful across countries and education levels. The time limit is 25 minutes; unanswered items score as incorrect, and there is no guessing penalty.
Items are generated, not stored. Each of the 35 slots is a rule template: its structure — family, step sizes, operand magnitudes, position in the difficulty ramp — is fixed, while the surface (which shapes, starting angles, mask configurations) is generated fresh for every session from a random seed. Two attempts therefore never present the same items, retakes measure reasoning rather than recall, and circulated "answer keys" are useless by construction. Every template is machine-verified at build time to produce exactly six visually distinct options across sampled seeds.
Scoring model
Your raw score (0–35) is converted to an IQ on the standard scale — mean 100,
standard deviation 15 — by a linear normal mapping: IQ = 100 + 15 × (raw − M) / SD,
where M and SD are the expected median and spread of raw scores for your age group:
- Ages 6–7: median 8, SD 5
- Ages 8–9: median 11, SD 5.5
- Ages 10–11: median 13.5, SD 6
- Ages 12–13: median 15.5, SD 6
- Ages 14–16: median 17, SD 6
- Ages 17+: median 18, SD 6
These norms are provisional calibration assumptions, set from the published difficulty of comparable matrix item types and pitched deliberately conservatively. They are not yet standardized against a large collected sample — the honest status of essentially every online IQ test, stated here explicitly instead of implied away. As anonymized response data accumulates, we will re-norm the mapping and document each revision on this page.
Why scores cap at 145
A 35-item test contains only a few items hard enough to separate the top fraction of a percent, so estimates beyond roughly +3 standard deviations are statistical noise. Sites that report 160s and 170s from short online tests are flattering their users. When you hit our ceiling, the result reads "145 — ceiling reached", meaning: well above 130, and only a professionally administered instrument with extended norms can resolve how far.
Accuracy and error
- Typical uncertainty: about ±7 points against a professionally administered full-scale test — wider near the floor and ceiling, and wider for children.
- Condition sensitivity: sleep, stress, device, interruptions and motivation routinely move single-session results by several points in either direction.
- Practice effects: retaking matrix tests inflates scores; your first calm attempt is the meaningful one.
- One component: we measure fluid reasoning only. A professional battery adds verbal comprehension, working memory and processing speed, which can each diverge from the composite by a full band.
What this test is not
It is not a clinical instrument, does not produce diagnoses, and is not accepted by schools, employers or high-IQ societies (none accept any online test). For decisions — gifted placement, IEP evaluation, disability assessment — the applicable tools are individually administered batteries such as the WISC-V (children) or WAIS-5 (adults), given by a qualified psychologist.
Privacy of results
Scoring runs entirely in your browser: your answers and score are computed client-side and are not transmitted to or stored on our servers. There is no account system. See the privacy policy for the complete picture.
Further reading
The design choices above follow the mainstream psychometric literature, including:
- Raven, J. (2000). The Raven's Progressive Matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology.
- Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge University Press.
- Wechsler, D. — WAIS and WISC technical and interpretive manuals (Pearson), for classification bands and SEM conventions.
- Condon, D. & Revelle, W. (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: development and initial validation. Intelligence — the open-science model for public test items.
- Ritchie, S. J. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science.
- Flynn, J. R. (2007). What Is Intelligence? Cambridge University Press — on secular score gains and what they imply about "fixed" ability.