Average IQ by Country
Estimated national average IQ for 79 countries, compiled from academic studies (Rindermann; Lynn & Becker) blended with PISA 2009–2024 results. Click a column header to sort.
| # | Country | Avg. IQ (est.) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇨🇳 China | 113 |
| 2 | 🇸🇬 Singapore | 113 |
| 3 | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 110 |
| 4 | 🇲🇴 Macao | 110 |
| 5 | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 110 |
| 6 | 🇯🇵 Japan | 109 |
| 7 | 🇰🇷 South Korea | 109 |
| 8 | 🇨🇦 Canada | 106 |
| 9 | 🇪🇪 Estonia | 106 |
| 10 | 🇫🇮 Finland | 106 |
| 11 | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | 105 |
| 12 | 🇦🇺 Australia | 104 |
| 13 | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | 104 |
| 14 | 🇨🇭 Switzerland | 104 |
| 15 | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 104 |
| 16 | 🇧🇪 Belgium | 103 |
| 17 | 🇩🇪 Germany | 103 |
| 18 | 🇵🇱 Poland | 103 |
| 19 | 🇸🇮 Slovenia | 103 |
| 20 | 🇸🇪 Sweden | 103 |
| 21 | 🇦🇹 Austria | 102 |
| 22 | 🇩🇰 Denmark | 102 |
| 23 | 🇫🇷 France | 102 |
| 24 | 🇮🇪 Ireland | 102 |
| 25 | 🇳🇴 Norway | 102 |
| 26 | 🇺🇸 United States | 102 |
| 27 | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | 102 |
| 28 | 🇮🇸 Iceland | 101 |
| 29 | 🇮🇹 Italy | 101 |
| 30 | 🇵🇹 Portugal | 100 |
| 31 | 🇪🇸 Spain | 100 |
| 32 | 🇷🇺 Russia | 99 |
| 33 | 🇮🇱 Israel | 97 |
| 34 | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | 97 |
| 35 | 🇬🇷 Greece | 96 |
| 36 | 🇲🇲 Myanmar | 94 |
| 37 | 🇿🇦 South Africa | 94 |
| 38 | 🇹🇷 Turkey | 94 |
| 39 | 🇧🇲 Bermuda | 93 |
| 40 | 🇮🇷 Iran | 93 |
| 41 | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | 93 |
| 42 | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | 92 |
| 43 | 🇷🇴 Romania | 92 |
| 44 | 🇳🇬 Nigeria | 91 |
| 45 | 🇦🇷 Argentina | 90 |
| 46 | 🇰🇭 Cambodia | 90 |
| 47 | 🇨🇲 Cameroon | 90 |
| 48 | 🇨🇺 Cuba | 90 |
| 49 | 🇲🇪 Montenegro | 90 |
| 50 | 🇹🇭 Thailand | 90 |
| 51 | 🇬🇪 Georgia | 89 |
| 52 | 🇲🇽 Mexico | 89 |
| 53 | 🇮🇳 India | 88 |
| 54 | 🇨🇮 Ivory Coast | 88 |
| 55 | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | 87 |
| 56 | 🇪🇬 Egypt | 87 |
| 57 | 🇵🇰 Pakistan | 87 |
| 58 | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | 87 |
| 59 | 🇧🇷 Brazil | 86 |
| 60 | 🇨🇴 Colombia | 86 |
| 61 | 🇲🇦 Morocco | 86 |
| 62 | 🇩🇿 Algeria | 85 |
| 63 | 🇧🇩 Bangladesh | 85 |
| 64 | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | 85 |
| 65 | 🇮🇩 Indonesia | 84 |
| 66 | 🇯🇲 Jamaica | 83 |
| 67 | 🇵🇭 Philippines | 83 |
| 68 | 🇦🇫 Afghanistan | 82 |
| 69 | 🇹🇩 Chad | 79 |
| 70 | 🇽🇰 Kosovo | 79 |
| 71 | 🇸🇨 Seychelles | 79 |
| 72 | 🇸🇩 Sudan | 79 |
| 73 | 🇹🇱 East Timor | 78 |
| 74 | 🇵🇬 Papua New Guinea | 78 |
| 75 | 🇰🇲 Comoros | 77 |
| 76 | 🇧🇫 Burkina Faso | 74 |
| 77 | 🇸🇾 Syria | 74 |
| 78 | 🇧🇮 Burundi | 72 |
| 79 | 🇳🇪 Niger | 71 |
Source: aggregation by worlddata.info (retrieved July 2026), blending Rindermann (2007), Lynn & Becker (2019) and regional studies with PISA 2009–2024; countries with unreliable underlying samples excluded. Values rounded to whole points.
Why these numbers are controversial
Most of the underlying data descends from compilations by Richard Lynn and collaborators, which have drawn sustained academic criticism: some national values rested on a handful of small, non-representative samples (children in a single school district, refugee populations, decades-old studies), and several were extrapolated from neighboring countries. Later compilations — including the blend shown here — improve on this by weighting large standardized assessments like PISA and dropping the weakest samples, but the country-to-country comparability problem never fully goes away.
The strongest evidence that these gaps are environmental is how fast they close. Measured averages in many countries rose by roughly three points per decade across the 20th century (the Flynn effect), and countries that rapidly expanded schooling and childhood nutrition saw their estimates climb in step. Numbers this mobile cannot be read as fixed properties of populations.
What actually moves a national average
- Years and quality of schooling — each additional year of education adds measurable points; test-style reasoning is substantially a trained skill.
- Childhood health — nutrition, iodine and iron status, infectious disease burden and lead exposure all leave detectable marks on cognitive test scores.
- Test familiarity — populations that grow up on standardized multiple-choice formats score higher on them, independent of reasoning ability.
- Sampling — who got tested: urban students vs. national cross-sections can differ by 10 points within the same country.
For the same caveat-first analysis inside the United States, see average IQ by state — a 10-point spread with the same education-and-economics story behind it.
Curious where you sit on the scale these averages are drawn from? The distribution inside every country is far wider than the differences between countries — take the free test or explore what each score means.
Every country's internal range is huge — where are you in it?
35 matrix puzzles · 25 minutes · instant score with percentile — free, no email, no tricks.
Start the Free IQ TestFrequently asked questions
Which country has the highest average IQ?
In this compilation, East Asian countries and city-states top the table — China and Singapore (113), followed by Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan (110), Japan and South Korea (109). Rankings differ between sources because each blends different studies, years and normalizations; treat the ordering as approximate.
What is the average IQ in the United States?
About 102 in this dataset (98–100 in others, depending on normalization). By definition the US population averages 100 on tests normed within the US — cross-country tables use a common international baseline instead, which shifts the numbers.
Do these differences mean some nations are innately smarter?
No — that reading is not supported by the evidence. Measured national averages track education quality and years of schooling, childhood health and nutrition, test familiarity, and how representative the samples were. Averages also move fast: several countries have gained the equivalent of 10+ IQ points within a couple of generations (the Flynn effect), far too quickly for genetics to be the explanation.
Why do different websites show different numbers for the same country?
Because the underlying patchwork differs: Lynn & Becker's academic compilations, PISA-based estimates and online-test aggregates use different samples, years and scale anchors. Values for well-studied countries are reasonably stable; values for countries with sparse data can swing by 5–10 points between compilations.